ArteActa 2021, 6:81-102 | DOI: 10.62804/aa.2021.014

Radikální povstání bude temné a imanentní. Anebo nebude vůbec

Jan Motal

The essay is a commentary on the translation of François Laruelle's text "On the Black Universe". It presents the key ideas of his non-standard philosophy, relating them to a critique of Marxism (the notion of "the last instance") and contemporary forms of negative theology. Darkness is conceived in both political and religious dimensions. The author presents Laruelle's conception of immanence in a soteriological perspective, as a precondition for a radical transformation of humanity in relation to the real. This interpretation is applied to the position of the artist in the late modern situation, and an outline of the dominant position of the artist-intellectual is presented. For art to meet the demands of Laruelle's program, it must suspend its domination, that is, acknowledge its inadequacy, but equally it must not succumb to the domination of other disciplines, such as politics or philosophy. This "heretical" position allows the artist to recover a relationship with the real and generic humanity, from which alone, according to Laruelle, a truly radical transformation can emerge.

Keywords: Marxism, christology, non-standard philosophy, negative theology, intellectual, the field of cultural production, performativity, victim

Published: December 15, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Motal, J. (2021). Radikální povstání bude temné a imanentní. Anebo nebude vůbec. ArteActa, 4(6), 81-102. doi: 10.62804/aa.2021.014
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Mark Fisher. Kapitalistický realismus. Přeložil Radovan Baroš. Praha: Rybka Publishers, 2010.
    2. Lauren Leve. Identity. Current Anthropology, 2011, č. 4, s. 513-535. Go to original source...
    3. Ronald Purser. McMindfulness: How Mindfulness Became the New Capitalist Spirituality. London: Shepperton House, 2019.
    4. John Milbank. Theology and Social Theory. Beyond Secular Reason. Malden - Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. Go to original source...
    5. William Franke. Apophasis as the common root of radically secular and radically orthodox theologies. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2013, č. 1, s. 57-76. Go to original source...
    6. John D. Caputo. The Weakness of God. A Theology of the Event. Bloomington - Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2006. Go to original source...
    7. Slavoj Žižek. The Fragile Absolute. Or Why Is The Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? London - New York: Verso, 2008.
    8. Creston Davis - Marcus Pound - Clayton Crockett. Theology after Lacan. The Passion for Real. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 2015.
    9. François Laruelle. Du noir univers. Dans les fondations humaines de la couleur. La Décision philosophique, 1988, č. 5, s. 107-112.
    10. Hyun Soo Choi. Seven Large-Scale Paintings. New York: Thread Waxing Space, 1991.
    11. François Laruelle. Koncept nefotografie. Přeložil Čestmír Pelikán. Praha: Fotograf 07, 2012.
    12. Tomáš Koblížek. Laruelle o fotografii. Sešit pro umění, teorii a příbuzné zóny, 2014, č. 16, s. 54-69, dostupné také z: http://vvp.avu.cz/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Sesit_16_2014_Koblizek.pdf (cit. 26. 6. 2021).
    13. Jan Sůsa. Stručný nástin ne-filosofie: Laruelle a Kolozova. Ergot [on-line], 2019, č. 1. Dostupné z: https://ergotsite.wordpress.com/2019/03/28/strucny-nastin-ne-filosofie-laruelle-a-kolozova/#_ftn41 (cit. 11. 11. 2020).
    14. Alice Koubová. Myslet z druhého místa. K otázce performativní filosofie. Praha: NAMU, 2019.
    15. Robin M. Jensen. The Cross. History, Art, and Controversy. Cambridge, MA - London: Harvard University Press, 2017. Go to original source...
    16. Rob Coley. In: Defence of "Noir Theory". Laruelle, Deleuze, and Other Detectives. Theory, Culture & Society, 2020, č. 3, s. 123-144. Go to original source...
    17. François Laruelle. Future Christ. A Lesson in Heresy. Překlad Anthony Paul Smith. London - New York: Continuum, 2010.
    18. François Laruelle. Théorèmes de la Bonne nouvelle. La Décision Philosophique, 1987, č. 1, s. 83.
    19. Jacques Lacan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955. New York - London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991.
    20. J. Peter Burgess. The Real at the Origin of Sovereignty. Political Psychology, 2017, č. 4, s. 653-668. Go to original source...
    21. François Laruelle. Principles of Non-Philosophy. Přeložili Nicola Rubczak a Anthony Paul Smith. London - New York: Bloomsbury, 2017.
    22. François Laruelle. General Theory of Victims. Přeložili Jessie Hock a Alex Dubilet. Cambridge - Malden: Polity Press, 2015.
    23. François Laruelle. "Je suis un collisionneur de concepts, pas un dialecticien." Non-Musicology [on-line], 2011. Dostupné z: http://nonmusicology.blogspot.com/2011/01/francois-laruelle-je-suis-un.html (cit. 11. 11. 2020).
    24. Richard A. Matzner. Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2001.
    25. Werner Heisenberg. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 1927, č. 43, s. 172-198. Go to original source...
    26. François Laruelle. Introduction to Non-Marxism. Přeložil Anthony Paul Smith. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing, 2015.
    27. Karl Marx - Friedrich Engels. Werke. Band 8. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1960.
    28. Karl Marx - Friedrich Engels. Werke. Band 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1962.
    29. Karl Marx - Friedrich Engels. Werke. Band 37. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1967.
    30. Darren Webb. Here Content Transcends Phrase. The Eighteenth Brumaire as the Key to Understanding Marx's Critique of Utopian Socialism. In: Mark Cowling - James Martin (eds.). Marx's Eighteenth Brumaire. (Post)modern Interpretations. London: Pluto Press, 2002, s. 247.
    31. John Fiske. Jak rozumět populární kultuře. Přeložil Petr A. Bílek. Praha: Akropolis, 2017.
    32. Katerina Kolozova. Toward a Radical Metaphysics of Socialism. Marx and Laruelle. New York: Punctum, 2015. Go to original source...
    33. Ilana Gershon. Neoliberal Agency. Current Anthropology, 2011, č. 4, s. 537-555. Go to original source...
    34. Pierre Bourdieu. Outline of a Sociological Theory of Art Perception. International Social Science Journal, 1968, č. 4, s. 589-612.
    35. Pierre Bourdieu. But who created the "creators"? In: Pierre Bourdieu. Sociology in Question. London: Sage, 1993, s. 139-148.
    36. Pierre Bourdieu. The Market of Symbolic Goods. Poetics, 1985, č. 1-2, s. 13-44. Go to original source...
    37. François Laruelle. Intellectuals and Power. the Insurrection of the Victim. Přeložil Anthony Paul Smith. Cambridge - Malden: Polity Press, 2015.
    38. Katerina Kolozova. The Lived Revolution. Solidarity with the Body in Pain as the New Political Universal. Skopje: Evro-Balkan Press, 2010.
    39. Alain Badiou. Saint Paul. La Fondation de l'universalisme. Paris: PUF, 1998.
    40. Sianne Ngai. Our Aesthetic Categories. Zany, Cute, Interesting. Cambridge, MA - London: Harvard University Press, 2012.
    41. Miklós Szabolcsi. Avantgarde, Neo-Avantgarde, Modernismus. Fragen und Vorschläge. In: Karlheinz Barck - Dieter Schlendstedt - Wolfgang Thierse (eds). Künstlerische Avantgarde: Annäherungen an ein unabgeschlossenes Kapitel. Berlín: Akademie Verlag, 1979, s. 23-38. Go to original source...
    42. Arthur C. Danto. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. Grand Street, 1985, č. 3, s. 184-185.
    43. Martin Puchner. Afterword. Please Mind the Gap between Theatre and Philosophy. Modern Drama, 2013, č. 4, s. 540-553. Go to original source...
    44. C. G. Jung. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung. Volume 12. Psychology and Alchemy. Přeložil R. F. C. Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content